Naxther

Rin has an very impressive knowledge of the rules and in case something would not be exactly by the rules but would simply be cool? He can come up with thoughtful rulings on the spot, a clear sign of his creativity (if his homebrew universe is not good enough for anyone). Any VTT issues that come up are addressed quickly and efficiently. On top of that, he is always willing to make time outside of sessions if something needs to be discussed. Reliable, resourceful, and supportive — Rin makes the game run smoothly for everyone.

My reviews are usually relatively on the longer side Anthro has a big potential to be a very good GM and maybe I will join him sooner or later to re-visit this review. Positive: - Anthro feels like a GM who enjoys the system and is very excited to run it - Inclusive in the roleplay - tries to get people hooked in the story if they push themselves into a story. - Nice starting screen/idle screens with animated background - Cheap price for SPG standards for the quality provided (at least till the first negative point - listed bellow - became an apparent thing) - Good music choice Negatives: - Right now, there are some issues such as that the game started at one price with a promise of the price staying. Yet, after few sessions (3 sessions) he started to consider doubling the price. What - in my opinion - is not a proper move to do. - There has been several issues with modules that has been pointed out yet Anthro felt reluctant to look into it (despite people, me personally as well, trying to help debug those) - Connected to previous point - Not so well known in foundry settings - Issues with pronunciation of some names and words - even when corrected - it felt that he was annoyed to be corrected + miss-naming characters when character A asked one question and he addressed character B - Not enough preparation for the session - a lot of times he is drawing over the "overall map" instead of providing some map - while the game is not marked as Theatre of Mind - Not-so-well known in DnD rules - when told as RAW - at least able to acknowledge his mistake - Some encounters felt that he wanted the NPCs to really go after the players to "down them" so he wins the battle against the players - in my opinion, GM should want group to win and throw the appropriate obstacles in the way

Knowledgeable GM, good roleplayer, great for beginners. Does go above and beyond upon player's requests as long as they are reasonable ;)

Lee creates fun way to tell the story and is for sure ready to tackle any shenanigans that the group throws at him. Knows rules well and provides additionally time off-session what is always welcome. PS: Everyone likes Bobby.

As any player, I always look for a few points that are more important than others. With some of the GMs, I did feel that we had a session once a week, then I was basically ignored for the week, and then the session started. With Mancer, it is the exact opposite, which I greatly appreciate. When I had some questions or feedback regarding the play, lore questions, or just wanted to discuss my character, he always found time outside of the game to get back to me (without any extra charge, obviously). That left me with the feeling that he genuinely cares about his players and cares about whether they are confident in their characters and plays. Other than that, he is fun to talk to, has great storytelling, always tries to draw those who are more introverted into the play, and makes combat seem fun and engaging. Basically, as any GM should be.